More on Flickr »
New from the MySociety genii:, capsule the curiously-capitalised PlaceOpedia. Think Google Maps ? Wikipedia. Brilliant. Except that, as I write, all the links read
6 January, 2007 at 10:35 pm
My experience with trip advisor is you’ll always get a couple of miserable sods but any more than a couple of negative comments then avoid. The people who were happy with a hotel that lots of others are calling crap probably have low standards… “Hmm lovely mild instant coffee and plenty of milk in the scramble egg powder – just how we like it dear.”
7 January, 2007 at 2:10 pm
Of course: some people will always have a bad time, and others will have different tastes. But this is why having an idea of the shape of the distribution is so important. If there are only a dozen reviews then it’s reasonable to read them all — but for Vegas hotels there are usually 500 or more. I want to know what proportion give the place low marks, as well as the average.
23 January, 2007 at 5:32 pm
I’d like to see National Rail enquiries quote some standard deviations (compiled from their live train monitoring site) on their timetable site. A useful rail journey planner would estimate your chances of making your connection, given the performance statistics, and calculate your backup plan. The return leg of my regular Aberystwyth commute (now over) would often involve missing a +31min connection in Birmingham, then making a -1min connection in Derby, arriving home at the originally proposed time. There are lies, damn lies and statistics. Just occasionally, we could do with more statistics.
Your email address will not be published.
© 2017 The Daily Grind
Theme by Anders Norén — Up ↑