« Comments not back at all, actually. | Home | Oh, happy day »

October 31, 2006

"User-Generated Content"

Frankly, my current search templates suck so badly that I can't face searching The Daily Grind to see if (or how often) I've had this rant before: the term 'User-Generated Content' is plain rude. If the audience is building your site for you, the least you can do is come up with a more civil form of address than 'user.' I can't begin to say how annoyed at get at all the TV people who insist on referring to UGC as if it's the next big thing -- not if they treat their customers with so little respect, it's not. I've two concrete observations on the term, however:

  1. The way TV types talk about UGC reminds me very directly of the way they talked about video to 3G mobiles, five years ago. I don't expect UGC, in the vague and woolly sense, to have any more impact than Sky News On Demand.
  2. Dive into Mark. Spot on.

(via Gruber, of course.)

[update, Wednesday: Boing Boing had a story a few days ago about a Nielsen Consumer Generated Media conference that barred attendees from... er... blogging about the conference.]

Archives

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jonathan published on October 31, 2006 8:07 PM.

Comments not back at all, actually. was the previous entry in this blog.

Oh, happy day is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.