Why large downloads?

| No Comments

We've been discussing -- again -- whether we should make 'big' versions of the SciCast films available for download, or just the embedded H.264 versions. By 'big,' I mean about 20Mb/minute, 640x480 resolution or higher, H.264 or WMV9 (VC-1?) -- nigh-on broadcast quality, and in most cases high enough quality to reveal problems with the original camera rushes. Archival-quality big.

I've felt all along that it's the right thing to do, and of course this is all Creative Commons-licensed so there's nothing stopping me doing it on my own time and bunging the films into Archive.org. But yesterday I found myself saying something that 'feels' right:

We publish high-quality versions of the films because they allow people to do things with SciCast we haven't thought of.

I've even got an example of this -- somebody has a quasi-commercial idea that would rely on their being able to munge the films in specific ways, and they couldn't do that without access to large-frame versions.

We should be pushing these ludicrous-quality versions up in the next week or so, though we haven't yet worked out how to integrate them with the site, so it might be a bit of a kludge in the short term.

Leave a comment

Categories

Monthly Archives

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 4.32-en

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jonathan published on August 23, 2007 10:59 AM.

It's probably a good thing I don't do anything important was the previous entry in this blog.

Why we're not using YouTube is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.