<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.majordojo.com/projects/FeedManager/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://quernstone.com/archives/2008/03/the-big-experim.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quernstone.com/archives/2008/03/the-big-experim.html" />
  <id>tag:quernstone.com,2010://1/tag:quernstone.com,2008://1.1623-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for The Big Experiment</title>
  <subtitle><![CDATA[Jonathan Sanderson&rsquo;s weblog]]></subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:quernstone.com,2008://1.1623</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://quernstone.com/archives/2008/03/the-big-experim.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quernstone.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1623" title="The Big Experiment" />
    <published>2008-03-27T18:00:26Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-27T18:00:26Z</updated>
    <title>The Big Experiment</title>
    <summary>I don&#8217;t get Discovery UK (heck, I don&#8217;t get Five), so I only have the web video clips to go...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Jonathan</name>
      <uri>http://quernstone.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://quernstone.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get Discovery UK (heck, I don&#8217;t get Five), so I only have the web video clips to go on to judge this new series: <a href="http://www.discoverychannel.co.uk/bigexperiment/home/index.shtml">The Big Experiment</a>.</p>

<p>Interesting. It&#8217;s a stunt series, essentially the same ideas as <a href="http://www.channel4.com/life/microsites/J/jamies_school_dinners/">Jamie&#8217;s School Dinners</a>, but I don&#8217;t necessarily object to that in itself. What 
annoys me is three-fold:</p>

<ul>
<li>That a populist science series is now so unusual, it deserves 
<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/ 
article3444848.ece">attention</a> merely for existing. My, how things have changed since 
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209789/">Don&#8217;t Ask Me</a>.</li>
<li>That it looks like it has to cheat in order to &#8216;compete&#8217; with 
Mythbusters and Brainiac.</li>
<li>If you <em>really</em> wanted to make a difference, and influence 
children&#8217;s lives, you&#8217;d make this stuff for Bebo. But of course, 
there&#8217;s no commercial sense in that&#8230;</li>
</ul>

<p>Despite this series, and a new (/rebadged) children&#8217;s engineering show the BBC 
are making, I still think science TV is dead. We&#8217;ve lost the culture 
of treating these series as routine and expected (in the same way that 
comedy and drama and news are), and I think the funding model is 
broken too. Particularly now Scrapheap Challenge has gone too, I can 
no longer see a career path for science TV specialists except via big 
documentaries.</p>

<p>By my reckoning, science television is no longer a sustainable industry. I don&#8217;t  think it has been for a few years already.</p>

<p>So I&#8217;m not miffed by The Big Experiment &#8212; it just makes me rather sad 
and wistful. Well, apart from one thing: their claim that lifting 
people with helium balloons has never been done before. Umm&#8230; yes, it 
has. There&#8217;s the (surprisingly non-apocryphal) man-in-a-lawn-chair 
story, then a couple of publicity stunts for a champagne company and 
Coca-Cola, and then an <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0305002/">old children&#8217;s TV show</a> did it almost ten years 
back.</p>

<p>I remember it clearly.</p>

<p>I was there.</p>
]]>
      

    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>

