Been there, done that, made the prop

Sometimes, I swear people actually watch my shows. Hard to believe, I know, but consider The Big Bang, now playing in endless repeats on Discovery Kids:

A few months after we did a cute trick involving dropping a cork so it lands on its end, a game appeared called ‘Corx.’ Which is… er… based on the same idea.

Then there’s the pneumatic marshmallow cannon we made in a later series. It was breech-loading and used a cunning arrangement of cardboard tubes and bin bags to make a neat step-down from a large-diameter piston chamber to a small-diameter barrel. It was astonishingly accurate, though an unforeseen problem involving marshmallows melting under studio lights rather limited its effectiveness on camera.

Great toy – one of the best things we invented on that show. Clever, elegantly simple, extremely effective. And now available commercially. Huh.

The tragedy is that the lead times of television are so radically different to those of other industries that we never managed to make any tie-ups work. Even the books we did featured material from the previous series, and arrived after the one we were making. Shame.

But for the record – no, I’m not sore about this. There’s no particular reason to believe that the designers of the marshmallow gun were inspired by The Big Bang. In fact, I’m delighted if kids are running around blatting each other with pneumatically-projected confectionary. It’s a lovely mechanism.

The pinnacle of Web 2.0

There’s a lot being said about the whole ‘Web 2.0’ blah… yeah, OK, there’s way too much being said about the whole ‘Web 2.0’ blah. About AJAX this and desktop-like that, draggable whatever and everything API’d up the wazzoo.

You know what really impresses me? What makes me sit up and take notice? What has me thinking ‘Wow, that’s clever! This site must really care about design issues’?

It’s when I type text in a search field, and it comes up in a large, styled, coloured font rather 10-point Monaco. Gets me every time.

I’m sorry, there’s something shiny over there that I must investigate…

Dropping caesium in water

Remember my post last week about Brainiac dropping caesium in water? I reposted my concerns to a mailing list of people who do science demonstrations, make museum exhibits, and so on, and we had a jolly little argument about whether it was plausible or not. We went roughly fifty-fifty, I think.

Then the chap who did it posted. Turns out, dropping 10g caesium in a bath of water does very little indeed, and (two years later!) they did indeed blow the heck out of a bath with stage explosives. What you see in that film is entirely faked.

[sigh]

Diet Coke / Mentos / Gutted

Gaaaah! I’ve avoided posting anything much about the whole ‘Diet Coke + Mentos’ thing that swept through science communication circles in the last year, because I’ve been wanting to do something very specific with it.

Unfortunately, that something is this. And I wasn’t involved. Harrumph.

Still – credit where it’s due, they’ve done a corking job of it. Wonderful, wonderful film.

Two days in London

Thursday: was frantic the night before, but had an excellent (and hugely productive) journey down on the West Coast line (zip-pow-blam-oh, we’re there already?). The Royal Institution was nigh-on deserted, it being the lovely Olympia’s wedding, so we snagged an office and set to work on my revised Christmas Lecture scripts.

Last year’s set are being toured to Japan and Korea, and muggins here is rewriting them. I was a bit nervous – I’ve found it terribly hard to get back into it, and as a result the couple I’ve attacked so far have felt like rush jobs. Several things were heartening, however. Firstly, watching a couple of the shows for the first time, on the way down (thank you UKNova), I discovered that they really weren’t half bad. For the record, David Coleman is a genius – and if you saw Question Time last night, that shamelessly bravura steadicam sweep behind the panel near the end would have been his doing.

Then, the scripts, for all the frantic surgery right up to transmission, were actually pretty coherent. And finally, leafing through them, I spotted all manner of more pleasing ways of saying things.

It was gratifying, then, to have Sir John pick through what I offered up, and profess wild enthusiasm. He must have been heartily sick of the damned things too, but we’ve managed to enthuse each other all over again, and found new ways of nuancing some aspects, new thoughts to draw out, and in one case I think even spotted – somewhat belatedly – what the lecture is about. Heck, John even approves of my recasting of the last lecture, which is going to become such a stirring clarion call for global scientific cooperation I swear we’ll have a string section in there by the time we’re done…

Friday: the How2 website dispatched for another week (what is it with organisations having rubbish upstream connections?), we dove into the months-old SciCast budget and schedule drafts to see what we could salvage. The good folks searching for industrial funding need to know how many people we might reach, which of course means brazenly making something up careful estimation and planning.

It was, frankly, a depressingly difficult meeting. Not because it revealed any underlying weakness in the project (there’s some tricky balancing to be done between mildly tangential objectives, but that’s a rolling ‘taking a step back and thinking really hard’ problem); rather, it underlined just how far we still have to go. It’s been four months since we first raised the idea, and it occurred to me that I could actually have taken that Birmingham TV job and would have finished in time to rejoin SciCast around the earliest point that’s now plausible for a formal ‘Go’. Eek.

So, with a heavy heart, I realise that I’m going to have to plot an escape route. It could easily take another two months to secure the industrial support we need, and I’m not sure I can hang around that long. Which would be tragic. On the other hand it might all fall into place with three phone calls. Still… bugger.

One rousing day, one melancholic one. On balance, life could be worse.

Blogging from the train

Picture 1

I’ve never blogged from a moving train before. Unfortunately, I won’t be tonight, either. While the GNER train is – miraculously – moving, I just don’t believe you’re so desperate to read my thoughts, dear reader, as to justify my spending £3/hour for access. It’s not the most expensive connection in the world, but still… ugh. Thanks, but no.

On the other hand, I am quite intrigued to know how they manage to keep a stable connection from the train to the outside world. Satellite? Trackside repeaters? Now if only I was online, I could Google around and find out…

DSC00135For a fleeting instant, I thought there might be something about that on the internal gateway server (which may, in fact, be routing outwith the train, I’m running a traceroute now). But the link is so $DEITYsawful slow, it’s not even loading the page. Oh, and the traceroute isn’t managing to do the reverse-DNS lookup thing, but is hopping furiously – so it looks like the gateway isn’t onboard. Interesting.

Quern:~ jonathan$ traceroute www.gner.co.uk

traceroute to www.gner.co.uk (160.79.17.234), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets

1 ims.gnerwifi.train (10.101.0.1) 32.219 ms 67.311 ms 31.421 ms

2 * * *

3 * * *

4 * * *

5 * * *

6 * * *

7 * * *

8 * * *

9 * * *

…

Has anyone actually coughed up for this? Is it as turgidly slow as I suspect?

The photo is just South of Berwick, by the way. I’m still reading Kafka on the Shore, but this is more PowerBook Zipping Past the Shore. Close, the mood my PowerBook’s been in of late.

Frozen fish

A colleague has just sent me a video. It shows a man (in a lab coat) taking a fish (possibly a flounder) out of a freezer. It’s on ice, and clearly frozen. The man next puts the fish in a tank of water. He does this very carefully, but when he lets go it falls to the bottom of the tank with a distinct ‘clunk.’

Seven minutes later, the fish is flipping around and seems quite happy. Well, quite happy for a flatfish that’s in a small glass tank of water and would rather prefer to be somewhere else.

It’s an extraordinary video. I’m not quite sure what I’m supposed to do with it, in part because the voice-over is in Japanese. Sadly, I don’t think I should post it. Boo!