Carbon offsetting accreditation?

Buying carbon offset is a bit of a minefield, in that it’s an unregulated industry and it’s hard to know that what you’re buying makes either sense or a difference. Tree-planting is all well and good, but does it have a long-term impact? And would the development projects in which you can invest happen without you anyway, in which case what is your money achieving?

Then there are the sharks in the water – I heard a lovely interview with a chap from HSBC a while back, in which he related that when word got around that the bank was planning to go carbon-neutral, he had calls from people offering to sell him swathes of the Amazon rainforest. He expressed… shall we say ‘polite suspicion’? – that the land was theirs to sell in the first place.

It’s somewhat surprising that, as far as I can tell, there’s no accreditation scheme for offset projects. If the RSPCA can manage the ‘Freedom Foods’ project, the Soil Association can do the whole organic thing, and there are more standards in the electronics world than you can shake a USB cable at – you’d think somebody with a recognisable brand would have this covered. But evidently not, or at least, not yet.

It’s encouraging, then, that the Commons environmental audit committee is to investigate personal air travel offset schemes. Compulsory accreditation or regulation at the UK or European level is on the agenda, as is requiring flyers to offset the emissions they cause. Hurrah!

Clearwire

I’ve avoided bitching much about Clearwire here, mostly because their bandwidth is so shite it’s rather hard to get the message out.

On the face of it, it’s a remarkable service: near-2Mbit near-WiMax service across Dublin. And indeed, from the Trinity College Sourceforge mirror I’ve seen over 150Kb/sec – which is great. However, beyond Ireland things aren’t so rosy. I see up to about 20Kb/sec from the BBC website, which is OK. From big US sites I get reasonable enough speeds, though still something like 20Kb/sec total – browser session reloads are painful.

But they’re clearly traffic shaping something chronic. If I had to make an educated guess, I’d say they’re prioritising all web traffic, and then traffic from popular sites, in a crappy attempt to mask inadequate peering arrangements. Case in point: from my blog server, in Los Angeles, I get about 10Kb/sec. To the same server, via FTP, I can just about sustain 5Kb/sec on a good day. On a bad day, there’s not even enough bandwidth to sustain an FTP control connection, which is an error I haven’t seen since I was doing FTP over a shared 9600baud serial link. Seriously.

Peer-to-peer apps like BitTorrent are completely nixed, and they’re doing really horrid things to Skype whereby the incoming data stream is excellent, but the outgoing sees 98% packet loss on a 12Kb/sec link, with 8 seconds round-trip latency.

Support are friendly, helpful, and responsive… until you quote any of this stuff at them. At which point they stop claiming it’s your configuration/firewall/router and just clam up.

Upshot: Clearwire Ireland: pile of poo. Avoid, avoid, avoid.

It’s not about the iPhone, honest

Chrysler’s chief economist has reportedly revealed his strategy on dealing with global warming: stick his fingers in his ears and shout ‘lalalalalala!’:

“He said that he had been surprised by how much support there had been in the Daimler office in Stuttgart for these [the Stern report’s] “quasi-hysterical” policies that smacked of “Chicken Little” politics – referring to the US children’s story in which Chicken Little runs around in circles saying “the sky is falling”.” (BBC News)

Yikes.

OK, I’ll shut up about the iPhone… soon

You have to picture me squinting hard here as I peer into the murky middle-distance… OK, so the iPhone runs OS X, right? Now, we don’t know what processor it’s packing. Note that the OLPC XO packs an AMD Geode x86 compatible, clocked at 400MHz, claimed to be equivalent to a PIII-500, and the whole machine rocks in at 20W. Plenty of people are assuming iPhone runs on an ARM of some sort, and OS X is demonstrably architecture-portable (heck, it just moved from PowerPC to x86, and there used to be SPARC and HP-whatever versions of its ancestor OPENSTEP) – so it could run on ARM. But does it need to? I’m rather assuming it runs on an ultra low-voltage Core Solo variant, but what do I know?

Whatever, it’s running enough of OS X to have Core Image and Core Animation, WebKit, the Security bits, and so on: which I guess means a chunk of Cocoa is there. Which other bits of OS X does it run, and how do developers get at it? It’s not clear if they’re going to be allowed to (sharp intake of breath), but one has to speculate:

Inkwell, right? Apple’s handwriting recognition software. It’s surprisingly good, and it’s integrated into OS X – plug in a graphics tablet and you can scribble all over the screen. We know Inkwell is portable too, since it’s also made it from PowerPC to x86… and because it started out on ARM. Er… huh?

Yeah, see, Inkwell used to be called ‘Rosetta,’ back in the day when it ran on – da-da-daaaa! – Newton.

Is anybody else amused by the prospect of running a 12 year-old ex-Newton handwriting recogniser on an all-new handheld from… er… Apple? Cracks me up, anyway.

More iPhone stuff

A few miscellaneous thoughts:
iPhone

  • Knowing that this was just around the corner, the folks at Apple must have looked at Zune last November and… laughed.
  • The Flash demos on Apple’s iPhone pages are amazing, and give a very clear indication of where the Leopard user interface is heading – lots of smooth animation, a very ‘fluid’ feel, many dynamic elements. Looks at Phone → Photos, and wait until it gets to the part where you’re emailing the photo – how cute? And yet, not gratuitous. This is animation with a point, and with taste. Very classy indeed.
  • Is anyone else thinking ‘Newton didn’t die. It just went away for 10 years?’
  • 8Gb isn’t enough. Already. Bah! 🙁

iPhone

Let me list this:

  • iPod
  • GSM mobile phone
  • 3.5mm headphone jack
  • microphone
  • ambient light sensor
  • proximity sensor
  • orientation sensor
  • 160dpi 3.5″ touchscreen
  • running OS X
  • Speakers
  • 2MP camera
  • WiFI
  • Bluetooth

Er… yowser. There’s ‘convergence device,’ and then there’s… this thing is going to cost a fortune, surely?

Mind you, so did the iPod, originally.

Incidentally – if this does indeed run desktop applications (as Jobs is suggesting), and you can hook up a Bluetooth keyboard, we have the ultraportable Mac laptop here, too.

Oh, and this is why Apple went to Intel. It’s presumably running a low-voltage Core Solo or similar.

Welcome to the orbiting world headquarters

I’m in Dublin. I’m about to Skype my director in Las Vegas, I’m in an IRC room with 987 others reading about a ‘revolutionary new product’ from Apple in San Francisco (and it’s not iTV Apple tv, they’ve already done that), and I’m texting news to a chum who’s on a bus heading to New York.

Life rocks.

[update: OS X-running iPhone tablet widescreen video iPod phone! Gaaaah! My head’s going to explode!]

Macworld predictions: I’m with Gruber

With a past prediction record second only to the Wall Street Journal’s, I’ve naturally been under some pressure this week to lay my cards on the table for this year’s Macworld. Here’s what I think:

Umm… that’s about it. I could go on (like… er… Mark, who’s suddenly gone all fanboy on us), but… um… these days, I’m outsourcing my punditry to Gruber. It’s just more efficient that way.

Oh, go on then:

  • New user interface: check. CoreAnimation has to be there for a reason, and most of it isn’t about 3D nonsense. I think the glossy black concept that’s been muttered about is likely the one – while Vista goes all glossily translucent and cuddly and ‘lickable’ (eu), OS X aims clear above it and goes all professional. Which would be a neat bit of maneuvering. That said, I think we’ll see dark grey (à la the Pro apps) rather than black, since the Aperture/Final Cut interface already works well and there are contrast issues and blah blah blah.
  • New MacBooks, iMacs, whatever: answer hazy, ask again later. We pretty much have to get new displays, in which case their bezels will tell us whether new machines are coming, whether they arrive today or not.
  • Handheld thing. iPod Phone? Palm Treo-esque thing? My money would be on something more like Dell’s new SideShow gizmo, but my money would be about 10p in this case. Apple’s really backed into a corner with the !(‘iPhone’) thing, in that whatever they reveal will disappoint a significant number of people. My guess is that Jobs will simply not release anything, rather than release something that’s not a complete wow.
  • HDTVs, iLife & iWork ’07, Airport Excessive X3, not a glimpse of Office:Mac 2008, Photoshop CS3 running like a banshee on an 8-way Mac Pro Ludicrous Speed – yeah, whatever. I’m done here.

Sheep

A conversation, in the vicinity of Shap Fell on the M6:

“By ‘eck, they’re hardy sheep up here.”

“They must be. Some of them look pretty fat, though.”

“Does that make them lardy hardy sheep?”

“I guess it does.”

“You know the way they baa — do you think they’re telling each other stories?”

“That would make them lardy hardy bardy sheep.”

“Quite.”

“Some of them look a bit fed up, don’t you think?”

“You mean — lardy hardy bardy mardy sheep?”

“Exactly.”

“Hey, those just scampering up the fell to join the others!”

“They’re late, huh?”

“Yes, they’re…”

“Lardy hardy bardy mardy tardy sheep?”

“Yes!”

“Can we stop now?”

“I think we’d better.”