Saturday media

Two things have caught my eye today. The first is an article in the Telegraph about a company in Russia selling corporate entertainment packages with a difference (free registration required). The clients are Moscow’s super-rich elite, bored of the excess. The packages include a monthly begging trip, complete with radish-stained clothing; another shindig saw the clients playing soldier with army tanks. The latter is more like the sort of thing that goes on in the West, but in a peculiarly Russian twist the day included (a.) live firing, and (b.) caviar for the squaddies, but combat rations for the clients to ‘add to the authenticity.’

The second piece is this parent’s perspective on anorexia from Salon. A decade ago, I saw freshers torn apart by the pressure and unfamiliarity of Cambridge, unable to cope with (comprehend?) all that goes along with the transition from being the brightest kid in the neighbourhood, to being a below-average student. Chuck in social pressures they’ve no framework for understanding, and you’ve a recipe for disaster.

I saw peers reduced to gibbering wrecks, and while I helped when I could, I had no perspective myself that allowed me to judge where the firmer ground was, that I could stand on. One very close friend changed so much, I essentially never saw her again. However, Cambridge’s dropout rate is reassuringly low, and indeed most students eventually regain an even keel, chalk one up to experience, and get on with their lives. The article’s quoted 15% mortality for anorexia patients is far more terrifying.

I never saw anorexia, but I’m unlikely to have understood it then and am barely more likely to do so now. I hope everything works out for the writer of the Salon piece, and particularly for his daughter. Meanwhile, this is simple but very personal journalism of the highest order, for which I’m eternally grateful.

3 thoughts on “Saturday media”

  1. Perhaps it’s just the cynic in me.. but I really hope that wasn’t a placed article by Pfizer… In the absence of a disclaimer of conflict of interests, and the absence of a name, and the offence/futility which can be predicted of asking the author; I suppose we’ll never know.
    I really do hope in the UK we don’t import the ‘freedom’ to do direct to public big pharma-advertising of prescription only medicines.. I doubt it would improve public health so much as industry bank-balances…

  2. Oh, you cynic, Martin. Only a medic would register the name of the drug in that article… though, to be fair, I did think ‘I bet Martin comments on this’ as I read that part.

  3. “Only a medic..” or, actually, anyone who might be a concerned relative/parent/guardian of a sufferer.. which, come to think of it would be the ideal target audience for that drug (aiming at patients in this condition probably doesn’t work).. would notice the drug name. Anyway, I’m labouring my point now.. I’ll fetch my coat.. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.