Data Protection Act

Merde. We’re about to hit a situation where we’ve half a dozen people phone-bashing and generally agitating for SciCast. We’ll be spread around different organisations and even cities, and we’ll all be doing this part-time. Coordination and ‘the big picture’ is going to be hard.

I’d love to use Highrise to bring us all together. Unfortunately… that would be exporting personal information to the US. Which is, one suspects, a bit of a no-no when it comes to the Data Protection Act. Dang.

Discussion in the Highrise forums. On the other hand, 37signals’ hosts, Rackspace, are on the Safe Harbor list (notes about which are here).

I guess I’m going to have to read up on what all this stuff means…

N95 rubbishness #346

One of the things that rather amuses me about the Nokia N95 is that the more I use it, the more I stumble across features that are spectacularly brain-dead.

This morning’s example: I wanted to know if the thing will play H264 video, since it’d be quite handy to carry SciCast films around with me. Now, I could go and look up the information, but it’s easier to fire up Bluetooth File Exchange and wave an example film over to the thing. 5Mb or so at 85Kb/sec – it’s quick enough.

The trouble is, the N95 puts the received movie not in its filesystem, but in the Inbox. From where I can do… absolutely nothing with it, except move it from one Messaging folder to another. It doesn’t appear in the filesystem browser, and I can’t open it from the Messaging app. Does this mean it doesn’t work? I don’t know.

Obviously, anything arriving via Bluetooth must be a message, right? Even if it’s a 5Mb video file. Rrrrright.

Stupid stupid stupid. As I’ve said before, I’d be at least entertained if it was a good phone. But it isn’t. The phone UI is clunky and crashy; it’s so keen to offer me the option to video call somebody that it enforces an extra click I just don’t want, every time; the SMS application has real problems with screen redraw, which slow it down tragically; etc etc.

It’s plain laughable. And not in a good way.

Big Bang photos

Damien has a set of photos up on Flickr from The Big Bang, the kids’ TV show we used to make in Leeds. They give you an idea of what it was like to make – involved lots of goofing around in an office with rolls of sellotape and string. And, yes, getting paid to do that. Fun!

Amusingly, I’m not in any of these pictures. By my reckoning this was series 6, shot in 2001. According to my notes, that was the last year we did significant location work – poor Sue in costume had to deal with 70+ outfits for all the history inserts, which was insane. I recall sitting in the online when dear Patrick asked us to rotoscope out the TV aerials in the back of shot, and us saying ‘This has gone too far.’

After series 6 we refocussed on studio make&do only, but by then CITV was starting the death spiral. For series 7 there was a change of presenters, and the resulting delays pushed the studio dates back so they straddled the technical closure of the department in Leeds. I wasn’t involved until the last gasp of shooting, when both Patrick and Colin (the original and then replacement series producers) had left the company.

When it came back for series 8 we were all a bit shocked, and it was a consolidation year, cherry-picking the good bits of the turbulent series 7. Damien was well gone by then, as I recall, heading eventually to his current feature film surfing magnificence.

Happily, series 9 was a fabulous return to the glorious behind-the-scenes atmosphere of the early years. If we had to finish the run, I’m glad it was then. A wonderful group of people, great ideas, and some corking telly out of it.

Big Bang was a nightmare at times, and I usually finished a series vowing never to do another one. But I still miss it.

[can you tell I’m in H264 compression greybarland, by the way?]

iMovie ’08 worries

Yesterday, Apple updated the iLife suite to ’08.’ It looks like a significant update all round, but most dramatically for iMovie. I’m a big fan of iMovie – while there are some parts of it that are less than obvious, training kids to use it takes all of five minutes, and in another five minutes they’re completely ignoring the software and concentrating on telling stories. Which, in my world, is what film-making is all about.

But you know, what I can see of iMovie ’08 worries me. The new interface and editing method looks, frankly, amazing. So what’s the problem?

The focus is on throwing movies together quickly, polishing them a little, then bunging them online. So iMovie now makes it easier than ever to find the bits of your rushes you like, shove them together, and export. Great. It looks like trimming (ie. adjusting an edit) is also more obvious than it was before. This is a distinctly good thing.

…and that’s about it.

See, the biggest limitation I find with what’s suddenly ‘old’ iMovie is that it’s hard to separate audio from video. ‘J’ and ‘L’ cuts – where an audio edit precedes or trails a picture edit – are extremely hard to pull off, and when you do, it’s frighteningly easy to lose lip-sync subsequently. The result is that it’s nigh-on impossible, in old iMovie, to edit dialogue and fix the pictures later. Which is what one normally does in… oooh, you know, films that tell stories.

Want to take dialogue somebody’s said and cut in a close-up? Not trivial in iMovie. Want to cut to a reverse for cover while you fix up a fluffed line in an otherwise good take? Not trivial in iMovie.

So the way SciCast workshops have gone is: students shoot, we pull the video into iMovie, and they lash together a rough-cut for viewing that afternoon. Great. But even from a standing start, by the end of the day they’re all asking how to use that bit of audio there, and trim that bit, and put that clip – minus its sound – there, and and and. But we’re out of time, so I take their notes and I finish off the film for them.

…which typically takes me about three hours in Final Cut Pro, often recreating the rough-cut from scratch before polishing it up. I am not, I should add, a slow Final Cut editor – I’m not a professional editor, but my standards for such things are extremely high, and I’m faster than some Avid pros I’ve worked with. I’d love to be able to fix stuff up in iMovie, but if there are more than a couple of edits to tweak it’s less infuriating to start again and have all the tools to hand in Final Cut.

What does iMovie ’08, then, have to offer the budding film-maker in this regard?

On the face of it, in my world… nothing.

Nothing?

Er… yeah. I’ve watched Jobs’ demo, and I’ve seen all the training videos, and from what I see there’s no split-track video/audio view. So the only way to do what I want – what my budding young film-makers want – will be to extract audio, delete pictures, and try to make identical-length buffer clips to keep everything in sync. Or something. Basically, impossible. It’s not even apparent if ‘skimming’ [cough‘scrubbing’cough] clips scrubs audio too.

At first glance, it looks to me as if iMovie 08 is highly optimised for cutting together a short, elegant clipsreel. But film-making? Not so much. In fact, anything that’s dialogue-led (except for voice-over), or anything that’s using multiple passes and takes, or anything with multiple cameras – from what I can see we’d be better off sticking with iMovie HD 6.

I can’t quite believe this can be right. This is Apple, right? They’re all about the creatives, about subtly training their users to become more professional so they graduate up the product lines. This is why some people think they’re patronising – iMovie has relatively few cheesy wipe transitions, because they make your video look awful, so Apple heavy-handedly protect you from that.

Can they really have made it harder to tell a story with video? Didn’t we go through all this with desktop publishing, when we had InDesign and that Quackers thing at the high end and basically nothing that mortals could use, and then eventually Pages came out and suddenly the rest of us could again make documents that looked good? What are 14 year-old directors supposed to use? Final Cut Express?

Or Premiere Elements on a Dell?

I’ll be buying iLife 08 as soon as I can, in the full hope that my worries are a product of Apple’s marketing focus rather than limitations in the new iMovie.

Of course, the next problem is that iMovie 08 won’t actually run on my old Power Mac. Gaaaaaaah!

[update Thursday morning: iMovie HD 6 has been made available as a free download for owners of iMovie ’08. Implication? ‘We know it’s not done yet.’ Also, lots of discussions in Apple’s boards about ’08’s partially lacking audio tools. Sounds like it’s not as bad as it might be, but still not a step forward except for clipsreel-type cutting.]

Visualise in Edinburgh

Gaz and Debbie have a long run of Visualise – the beauty of science in Edinburgh at the moment. Flossie (who was involved in earlier incarnations herself) has pointed me to a pair of reviews that appear to bear out the contention that the show divides audiences.

I rather like the show, myself. Toddle on down and see what you think. And hey – there are reviews. That means audience. Plural!