Blog rejigging

The irregular reader may have noticed a few changes around here, including but not restricted to a rather extended period over the weekend where everything was broken.

Oops.

So, I’ve brought my Movable Type install up-to-date, and switched to the Mid-Century template set, which is a dashed sight prettier than the defaults I was using before. There are serifs, and everything.

The sidebar is still acting a bit funky (‘Recent Comments’ should be more like ‘Random Comments,’ but hey, that’s interesting too), and submitting comments is still a little borked (it works, but the system might not give you much confidence in it having done so).

Meanwhile, I’ve moved my funky Action Stream into a separate page, linked from the new bar above. It aggregates what I’ve been doing around the web for the last week.

At some point I’ll try to integrate that stuff into the flow of the main blog. However, the instructions for doing that look a tad painful, and I should combine that with collating actions together so Twitter and Flickr stuff doesn’t spew all over the page. Eu.

That, however, looks far too much like hard work.

Aaaanyway: looks like we’re back. More-or-less.

…

Hmm. I need to get some green back in, somewhere.

At last, a use for Comic Sans

The typeface everyone loves to hate finally has a natural habitat: transcriptions of Sarah Palin interviews. Brilliant. [via Tim Duckett]

See also: Palin interview with CBS, and this College Humour take on the whole ‘Caribou Barbie’ hockey mom thing.

If Americans actually vote for these idiots, can the rest of us bring a case in the international courts for them being criminally negligent as a nation?

Toadstools

Toadstools

Flossie and I were in North Yorkshire for a few days, earlier in the week. Heading down to the Mallyan Spout (a waterfall, which seems obvious once you know despite being mysterious when you first hear the name), I spotted these toadstools. Hopping the fence, Flossie delighted in her natural environment – vis. grubbing around in the mud – to snag this photo.

Shiny.

Facebook Status Lines That Made Me Laugh

“Simon Laidlaw is doubtful his services will still be required at the Lehman Bros. vs. HBoS golf tournament.”
“Alan Bell is overwhelmed with workload forecasting.”
“Jo Brodie is transferring the contents of her bank account into a zero interest sock-delimited sub-mattress account for safety’s sake.”
“James Piercy has achieved resonance at 1018Hz.”

I do wish all these people were on Twitter instead, though. I hate having to go into Facebook to do anything with their bonnes mots.

30 Rock

I’ve been watching 30 Rock recently. Late to the party, I know, but what’s new?

It was a slow start for me – I probably wouldn’t have stuck with it past the first few episodes had they not been only 20 minutes long (my heavens, does American TV really have that many adverts in a half-hour show? Crumbs). But I’m glad I did give it the benefit of the doubt, since once it loosens up a little it’s a terrific show.

There’s nothing particularly innovative about it: dysfunctional, mildly neurotic, ‘kooky’ young professional woman struggles to maintain sanity/control/dignity in her all-consuming job while contriving narrowly to miss the American dream despite seemingly ‘having it all’ in New York. Gee, where have I heard that one before?

However, Tina Fey is, I now understand, something of a genius. Her performance is smart – it’s tempting to write ‘sassy,’ but that’s curiously old-fashioned, right? – and her character stops just short of ‘cutesy,’ somewhere around the ‘adorable’ mark. The supporting cast is a mixed bag, but Alec Baldwin is wholly brilliant, and Fey cannily cedes the comic initiative to him whenever they share the screen. One gains the impression that she enjoys writing his character even more than she does her own, and her delight at his performance is palpable.

But there are two things that really set the show apart from the crowded middle ground of comedy. Actually, one thing, come to think: the show has a very clear idea of its own limitations. It’s not trying to be anything other than straightforward entertainment; it never forgets that it has to make you laugh.

So, the Tracy Jordan character is problematic. It’s a very broad stereotype, played equally broadly. But every time I think I’m about to throw something at the screen, some twist or nuance to the character is revealed that dissipates the tension. It’s brilliantly-judged.

Similarly, the show manages never to take itself too seriously. This was, of course, the problem with Aaron Sorkin’s superficially-similar Studio 60, which somehow got itself portrayed as comedy despite being fairly straight drama, and then disappeared up its own redraft in a horrid molasses of self-referential fermentation. I rather it enjoyed it, but then I work(ed) in TV.

In contrast, the worst judgement involved in 30 Rock is the title. Once the characters, setting, and dynamic are introduced, the show settles into a pleasingly genial attitude of mucking about with the format. One suspects the following exchange occurs frequently:

“You can’t do that! It breaks the rules.”
“It’s only a TV show. As long as it’s funny, who cares?”
“Oh yeah.”

For example: it’s become gratingly commonplace for shows like this to break the fourth wall – that is, for characters to turn to camera and address the audience directly. At times this can work rather well (Hustle), but usually it’s plain irritating (also Hustle). 30 Rock does it sparingly, and on at least one occasion I was willing them to do it, and was still surprised when they did.

That sort of willing conceit, where the audience is almost literally cheering the show on, waiting for the line or pay-off we know is coming, is desperately hard to pull off in practice. By the end of the first series, for me, 30 Rock is doing it in almost every episode.

Aware that they have the audience exactly where they should be – rooting for the show – gives the writers leeway to arse about. And they do. Gloriously. Gags, set-ups, locations, and even music sequences that ought to be appallingly indulgent are instead pulled off with such bravado that we’re left gasping for more. There aren’t many examples of productions with such a clear sense of joy, perhaps outside children’s TV.

We worked desperately hard with The Big Bang to buy ourselves the latitude with the viewer to do basically anything: we were cheeky, broke our own rules, played with the format. It was a joy, and the flexibility we granted ourselves was why I loved the show. But in practice it was a tremendously difficult thing to do, because that sort of flexibility requires that the audience indulge the show, and that sort of respect has to be earned. With The Big Bang we only really got it right after nine series.

30 Rock is there before the end of one. Terrific writing, exemplary attention to detail, and ruthless production discipline: it’s a brilliant example of television craft. I love it.

That was a bit gushing, wasn’t it?

Private No. calling

If you’ve been trying to reach me by phone in the last few days, and your switchboard blocks your caller ID number, it might help if I made you aware that:

  1. My phone cuts off when I try to receive such calls. I don’t know why. Also:
  2. It won’t connect to my voicemail either.

Yes, you’d be right to think that this is broken and ridiculous. Surprisingly, people wonder why I’m not entirely happy with my N95.

Anyway: email me as jonathan[ at ]quernstone.com.

Though… I’m going away for a few days. But at least I will receive your message eventually.

One codec to rule them all

A year behind Adobe, Microsoft are rolling over and have announced they’ll support H.264 video in Silverlight.

That’s now a clean sweep for the format – if Microsoft handle file formats in a sane way (and that’s a big ‘if’), we should be able to encode once and embed as Flash, Silverlight or Quicktime, stream through these or (gaak) Realplayer, and download via iTunes to iPods, Playstation Portable, and other portable devices. Another compression pass at higher bitrate gets you Blu-Ray.

Game over. Finally, we have one video codec for everything. Astonishingly, it’s a good one, too.

Now that the delivery part of the process is sorted, and AVCHD is happening for acquisition, attention is rather drawn to the edit suite. Come on, Apple, let’s have Final Cut Studio 3 with a workflow like that for HDV: edit raw but render, when necessary, to ProRes.

[Edit: There’s a catch, of course. At the moment, standard H.264 formats aren’t supported in Windows Media Player. So Windows users viewing a film in Silverlight in their browsers would need Quicktime or VLC or whatever to view the same file downloaded. I’m going to assume Microsoft will plug this ridiculous hole at some point in the near future.]

We don’t do acronyms here

You know, I’d be sorry to see the likes of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley go under. Not because I have any particular vested interest in them – though I do hope a chum of mine who works at the latter is weathering this particular storm – but rather for their names.

See, ‘Goldman Sachs’, ‘Morgan Stanley’, ‘Lehman Brothers,’ ‘Merrill Lynch’ – these are names from a previous era. In my book, large companies should be named after small groups of people, who built the business out of a cowshed with their own hands, slaving late into the night with only a kerosene lamp and a dream.

Engineering companies used to be like this: Hawker Siddeley. Armstrong Whitworth. Vickers Supermarine (though I’m not sure who Mr. Supermarine was, it’s a cool name). The decline of interest in engineering careers can, I posit, be traced to the amalgamation of these proud institutions into the likes of the antiseptic ‘British Aircraft Corporation.’ Even ‘English Electric’ was better, barely.

If all financial institutions end up with names like ‘HBOS’ or, worse, ‘Lloyds TSB HBOS.’ it’ll be the end of Britain as a financial centre. The kids will simply lose interest. You mark my words.